On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 18:11 +0100, Per Jessen wrote: > rich...@buzzhost.co.uk wrote: > > > This was raised as the IP appeared in HABEAS and for a few hours it > > 'vanished' from the list. It's back there now, but DateTheUk is now > > pumping out via an ip six decimal places up on the last octet. > > > > 80.75.69.195 WHITELISTED: sa-accredit.habeas.com > > > > The customer concerned then hopped their output to:80.75.69.201 > > 80.75.69.201 WHITELISTED: sa-accredit.habeas.com > > FYI, 80.75.69.192 - 80.75.69.255 belongs to Easydate Ltd in Edinburgh. > > > /Per Jessen, Zürich > Correct, and the hits in habeas are shown. The issue with RP is a side distraction to this.
- Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDI... jdow
- Re: J.D. Falk spineless insults (Re: HABEAS_ACCREDI... jdow
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Yet Another Ninja
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Charles Gregory
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Charles Gregory
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Chr. von Stuckrad
- Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Charles Gregory
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? rich...@buzzhost.co.uk
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? Per Jessen
- Re: [sa] Re: HABEAS_ACCREDITED WHY BY DEFAULT? jdow