On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 14:04, rich...@buzzhost.co.uk <rich...@buzzhost.co.uk > wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 06:55 -0700, LuKreme wrote: > > On 3-Dec-2009, at 23:06, R-Elists wrote: > > > certainly we understand your point here, yet what about accountability > for > > > Return Path Inc (and other RPI companies) related rules in the default > > > Spamassassin configs? > > > > > > My position on HABEAS is well-know by anyone who cares (I score it +0.5 > and +2.0); that's not what I'm talking about: it's the constant whinging by > richard and falk at each other. Obviously they WANT to be communicating > since otherwise they could easily ignore/killfile each other. I'm just tired > of them doing it on this mailinglist. > > > Your idea of 'constant' amuses me and is stretching the truth > exponentially. > > I'm curious why a commercial whitelist from a bulk mailing company has > such a positive inroad in Spamassassin. It's a fair question. I'm not > interested in your personal views of me, my question or my posting. You > have a killfile? You able to ignore on subject? Skills you may find > useful to learn yes? > Richard, quit it. It's unreasonable to assume that all of the subscribers to this list should have to listen to, or need to set up a killfile just to avoid, your ranting. -- --j.
