> Still doesn't answer my question. Perhaps I'm "dense". But to > spell out my question more explicitly: > > what do you mean by "personal response spam"? Is that just > Richard's on-list responses we've all seen? Or something > else? (did I miss that part of the conversation?). And what > do you mean by "to this account"? > To this list? To your own inbox? Are you referring to > messages that are obviously from Richard (including alter-ego > ones)? Or some kind of UBE campaign that you think he is > behind? (if so, please describe) > > Still confused. > > -- > Rob McEwen Rob, dont be confused, she missed a comma in that line was all... btw, we are still waiting on the hearsay secret squirrel info... - rh
- RE: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... Michael Hutchinson
- hacking whitelists (was Re: [... J.D. Falk
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... jdow
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... Rob McEwen
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... jdow
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... Chris Hoogendyk
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... Rob McEwen
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... John Hardin
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... jdow
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... Christian Brel
- RE: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... R-Elists
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... Christian Brel
- Re: [sa] RE: emailreg.org - t... jdow
- RE: emailreg.org - tainted wh... Charles Gregory
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Res
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list mouss
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Christian Brel
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list Marc Perkel
- Re: emailreg.org - tainted white list jdow