On Thu, 17 Dec 2009 09:04:18 -0500 Matt Kettler <mkettler...@verizon.net> wrote:
> No.. If you're using file-based bayes, there's no good way to share > updates between one DB and the other. The information needed to make > such a merger successful isn't stored, because it is not needed for > any reason within SpamAssassin. The database merely stores the token, > it's spam count, it's nonspam count, and a last-seen timestamp. If > you look at the same token in 2 different databases, you can't really > merge these counts, because you don't know how many occurred since > your last merge. I'm not saying it's a good idea, but it is possible provided that you retained the result of the previous merge. It should be simple to script too.
