> > Spamassassin is not something trivially installed like a > piece of Microsoft junkware. In fact, it is nearly impossible > to get it to do anything useful without reading lots of > documents Daryl. Couple this with the fact it only *scores* > mail - it does not block it - any mish mash of rules could be > argued to be 'safe'. If it were deployed at the SMTP level > where it was kicking out 55x's it may be a different story. > So the 'safe' angle really has no legs. >
CB, the thing is, some of us do have SA integrated in such a way as to reject spam at SMTP time that is one of the main reasons why we do not believe that UBE should be given preference in SA as a *default* in general, if legit companies with legit MOI lists and whatever other *legit* email admin concerns cannot make simple emails that will not be scored as spam and make into easily into people's email boxes then too bad. way too much & way to frequent UBE junk. - rh
