At Thu, 31 Dec 2009 17:53:24 -0800 (PST),
John Hardin wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jan 2010, Mike Cardwell wrote:
>
> > I just received some HAM with a surprisingly high score. The following
> > rule triggered:
> >
> > * 3.2 FH_DATE_PAST_20XX The date is grossly in the future.
> >
> > Yet the date header looks fine to me:
> >
> > Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 00:46:45 GMT
> >
> > In /usr/share/spamassassin/72_active.cf I find:
> >
> > header FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Date =~ /20[1-9][0-9]/ [if-unset: 2006]
> >
> > Doesn't look particularly sane to me... I have given that rule a score
> > of 0 in my local.cf for now.
>
> Agree, that should probably be [2-9][0-9].
What about
header FH_DATE_PAST_20XX Date =~ /(201[1-9])|(20[2-9][0-9])/
and
##{ FH_DATE_IS_200X
header FH_DATE_IS_200X Date =~ /200[0-9]/ [if-unset: 2006]
describe FH_DATE_IS_200X The date is not 200x.
##} FH_DATE_IS_200X
-Herbert
