On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> Henrik K wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:59:25AM +0100, Per Jessen wrote:
> >> Henrik K wrote:
> >> 
> >> > On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 04:16:29PM +1000, Res wrote:
> >> >> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010, Henrik K wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >>>>>>         (?:[01257]|(?!127.0.0.)127|22[3-9]|2[3-9]\d|[12]\d{3,}
> >> [3-9]\d\d+)\.\d+\.\d+\.\d+
> >> >>>>>
> >> >>>>> Thats crazy!  It's wrong since 1/8 is now allocated, it also
> >> >>>>> does not detect most other bogon ranges, What is the point of
> >> >>>>> this... Another rule I now need to disable.
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>> Please open a bug...
> >> >>>
> >> >>> https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6295
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks for logging that.
> >> >>
> >> >> I do think we need a better way to catch them, including the other
> >> >> 20 or so plus bogon ranges it currently ignores. I can see where
> >> >> DNS checks would be better suited (bogons.cymru.com), or, at the
> >> >> very least, a ruleset, which can be updated in the "daily updates
> >> >> run" when new ranges are allocated.
> >> > 
> >> > DNS checks would be overkill for a list that doesn't change that
> >> > often.
> >> 
> >> Overkill yes, but "affordable", especially with results being cached.
> >> Personally I would favor DNS for data that _does_ change, even if
> >> only very rarely.
> > 
> > It just doesn't make sense. Do you know how many requests they would
> > be flooded with if it was default SA option? It would query _all_
> > untrusted ip and by -clauses in Received path? How is that
> > "affordable"?
> 
> Well, it obviously depends on your setup, but even if you don't have
> your own DNS, the results can be cached locally (nscd), so the overhead
> is still not a lot (IMHO).
> Anyway, like I said, it's just my personal preference.

If it's your preference, you are free to use it such way and code a plugin
for it (it can't be made to work without mods/plugin currently). They do
offer free zone transfers, so it's not that bad. But disregarding personal
preferences, it makes no sense to use DNS generally for this list.

Reply via email to