On Mon, 2010-02-01 at 12:09 -0500, Adam Katz wrote: > It might be nice to have the URI rule check From, Reply-to, and > Subject. We'd have to be careful so as to not include /all/ headers > as many different mailing lists use various headers for subscription > management and PGP systems often use headers for pubkey locations, and > I'm sure there's other stuff out there too. > I've raised an enhancement request bug (6317) suggesting that its only necessary to deal with the 'personal name' part of the From: header. Thats 'personal name' as in
From: personal name <u...@example.com> since Subject can already be searched with body rules. It seems to me that subverting headers other than From: and Subject: doesn't really gain a spammer much since you can't guarantee that any other headers with free text in their value string can be seen by the recipient, particularly if their MUA has its default configuration. I'd like to be able to scan From: headers with body rules as well as uri rules because then one medical product rule can deal with the product reference regardless of whether its in the message body, subject or sender name. I've only raised this bug as a reminder, so feel free to cancel it if its doesn't add any value or the implementation and/or run-time costs are too high. Martin