On Fri, 12 Mar 2010 15:44:21 -1000, Julian Yap <julianok...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 7:58 AM, micah anderson <mi...@riseup.net> wrote: > > > On Tue, 9 Mar 2010 11:56:56 -1000, Julian Yap <julianok...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > Just wanted to add that this particular line is incorrect: > > > meta SC_HAM (USER_IN_WHITELIST||USER_IN_DEF_WHITELIST|| > > > USER_IN_ALL_SPAM_TO||NO_RELAYS||ALL_TRUSTED||USER_IN_BLACKLIST_TO|| > > > USER_IN_BLACKLIST) > > > > > > That will have Blacklisted email filters classified as ham. > > > > Interesting, thanks for the reply from an old thread. > > > > I got this list from: > > http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/ShortcircuitingRuleset which seems > > to be something that Justin Mason put together. I have CC'd Justin on > > this email.
> > Which has the difference of also including "SUBJECT_IN_WHITELIST", and > > "SUBJECT_IN_BLACKLIST"... but now I am wondering if this is the right > > thing to do. I actually removed the SUBJECT_IN rules as this makes it so any individual user who can whitelist/blacklist a subject can shortcircuit for everyone. > > I'm very curious about resolving this, it does seem like a bad setup and > > it is being taken as gospel from the spamassassin wiki, but perhaps > > there is something that we are not understanding here that Justin can > > clarify? > > > > I'm pretty sure yours is wrong. You need to take out the the rules which > apply to Spam in spam short circuiting. I agree with you, its amazing that this has been wrong on the wiki since 2007! I went to go update the wiki today, and found that you had just done it. Thanks for doing that! Micah
pgpBuehAyiHwT.pgp
Description: PGP signature
