>> On Thu, 17 Jun 2010, Randy Ramsdell wrote: >>> The original email did not hit the NO_RELAYS rule but subsequent runs >>> through do hit this rule and it isn't on all email.
> Charles Gregory wrote: >> This sounds to me like you are 'resending' the mail from a local >> address to your mail server, rather than 'feeding' the original mail >> back into spamassassin. If this is the case, then you would naturally >> produce a new set of headers, and there would be no external relays, >> thus triggering the NO_RELAYS rule.... On 17.06.10 12:13, Randy Ramsdell wrote: > Hmmm, this mail came in and went straight to the users inbox. 1. > Postfix ---> 2. Amavis ( Spamd/Clamd) ---> 3. Postfix ---> 4. > Dovecot-deliver in this case, this problem belongs more to amavis mailing list, not to spamassassin one. -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. 2B|!2B, that's a question!
