On Mon, 2010-10-11 at 23:37 -0700, Gnanam wrote: > My question is, though SA reports 2.8 points at the top, on summing-up each > points from the Content analysis details, it is only 2.7 points. Why SA is > reporting/showing an increase by 0.1 point from its Content analysis details > points sum? > The report truncates scores to one decimal point. Your report shows several low scoring rules as 0.0 when they're almost certainly in the range 0.01 to 0.09. Scores of +/-0.01 are commonly used for rules that are used as meta components but shouldn't otherwise affect the score.
There's a clue staring yo in the face: NO-RELAYS will certainly have a low negative score: -0.0 is an impossible value but the sort of thing that truncating a value of -0.01 would give. > Here is the > Content analysis details: (2.8 points, 5.0 required) > > pts rule name description > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > -0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP > 0.0 NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP URI: Uses a dotted-decimal IP address in URL > 0.7 HTML_IMAGE_ONLY_20 BODY: HTML: images with 1600-2000 bytes of words > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > 1.1 MIME_HTML_ONLY BODY: Message only has text/html MIME parts > 0.6 HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG HTML-only message, but there is no HTML tag > 0.3 HTML_SHORT_LINK_IMG_3 HTML is very short with a linked image > -0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers Martin
