On 11/8/2010 6:04 PM, Lawrence @ Rogers wrote: > On 08/11/2010 12:06 PM, Ned Slider wrote: >> >> Fair enough - fortunately I've not seen any of those here so assumed >> a genuine facebook mail had maybe slipped through into the corpus by >> mistake. >> >> Either way, it was fixed by the time I'd spotted it. > I've seen it as well, and disabled the Sought rules. They were causing > too many FPs and not hitting enough spam to be worthwhile.
I haven't seen a lot of false positives, but you're right that they are not hitting much spam. I just checked my logs for the past two weeks and the Sought rules have hit on just over 1% of my spam. They used to be the top rules in my list. What happened? -- Bowie
