On Fri, 10 Dec 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
On 12/8/2010 6:26 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Wed, 8 Dec 2010, Marc Perkel wrote:
> Hitting the tarbaby server by itself doesn't get you listed. I have
> ways of detecting spambots only.
"tarbaby" has a very different connotation: that it is a TCP or SMTP
tarpit. This will make people nervous to use it.
It's not just a tarpit.
"It's not _just_ a tarpit"? Is it a tarpit _at all_? Do you understand
exactly what is meant by the term "tarpit"?
If it _is_ a tarpit, no sane admin would put it as _any_ of their MXs...
It builds the hostkarma blacklist.
I'm aware of that, but that is distinct from being a tarpit, which is what
I'm trying to clarify.
Karsten, is this OT enough to be squelched?
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Where are my space habitats? Where is my flying car?
It's 2010 and all I got from the SF books of my youth is
the lousy dystopian government. -- perlhaqr
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
5 days until Bill of Rights day