On 2/7/11 1:28 AM, Matus UHLAR - fantomas wrote:
On Tue, 1 Feb 2011 09:49:36 -0500
Michael Scheidell<michael.scheid...@secnap.com> wrote:
because HELO doesn't match RDNS.
On 01.02.11 09:54, David F. Skoll wrote:
Rejecting on that basis would also cause tons of false-positives.
It's also violation of all SMTP RFCs (former and current), because they
explicitly say that the sender MUST NOT reject smtp session just because
HELO string does not match resolved FQDN.
Does anyone else reject messages where the rDNS maps to more than one PTR
record?
