Le 19/02/2011 04:58, Frank Reppin a écrit : > Hi list, > > Ok - think of it as beeing solved. > I could make something 'useful' after > digging more in HeaderEval.pm. >
did you take a look at the code that implements DATE_IN_FUTURE_* rules? > But later then... this raises another issue. > I'll open a separate thread on this one. > > Thanks. > frank\ > >
