For the first time I finally feel like I'm getting closer to getting this
thing to work - THANKS EVERYONE FOR ALL THE HELP! I did a test with a real
email this time that included a blocked uri and the it actually scored it!
Content analysis details: (24.7 points, 5.0 required)
pts rule name description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
-0.0 NO_RELAYS Informational: message was not relayed via SMTP
0.9 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
20 LOCAL_URI_EXAMPLE_13 URI: LOCAL_URI_EXAMPLE_13
0.5 NULL_IN_BODY FULL: Message has NUL (ASCII 0) byte in message
0.6 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header
0.0 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header
-0.0 NO_RECEIVED Informational: message has no Received headers
2.7 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header
0.0 NO_HEADERS_MESSAGE Message appears to be missing most RFC-822
headers
I'm not there just yet though...is there a spamassassin log file? Although
it looks to be working from the test, I just sent the same message that was
scanned from an outside email and it went through.
Karsten Bräckelmann-2 wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2011-03-02 at 13:59 -0800, an anonymous Nabble user wrote:
>> Thanks Martin, for your help and time. As you can see, I'm really new to
>> SA.
>> I do see that the rules are there from the install and the the DNS module
>> is
>> there. However, when I send a test email it doesn't score for the bl
>> uri.
>> I created a test message that the only thing it has is 9hz.com, which is
>> a
>> bl site, and this is how it scores it.
>
>> 0.9 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header
>
>>From your scores I can tell you are using SA 3.3.x, and score-set 0.
> That is, both Bayes AND network tests disabled. You will need to enable
> network tests. Or rather, not disable them, since they are enabled by
> default.
>
> Hint: The option 'skip_rbl_checks 1' does NOT enable them, despite the
> positive 1 argument.
>
> Likewise, make sure skip_uribl_checks is not set to 1, either. And do
> not use the -L, --local option with 'spamassassin' (for ad-hoc testing)
> or 'spamd', since this explicitly disables network tests.
>
> Also, do make sure DNS works on that machine. That is, specifically the
> first nameserver entry in /etc/resolv.conf must work.
>
> The -D debug output will tell you if DNS is available, though not with
> the --lint option, which disables network tests. Feed it a mail instead.
>
>
>> No points for the uri rule.
>
> User support is all about being psychic -- or crystal balls. ;)
>
> (More serious, this is the classic of not just answering a particular
> user question, but to understand -- and have the user articulate --
> their actual issue, not what they think might solve it...)
>
>> >>> On 3/2/2011 8:49 AM, Karsten Bräckelmann wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> Point being, this domain and likely most (if not all) others in the
>> list
>> >>>> you're basing off, are listed in URI DNSBLs. This particular one is
>> >>>> listed in URIBL and SURBL JP and PH. With network test enabled, SA
>> will
>> >>>> score them high already.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> So what is the point in this static, and likely huge, list of uri
>> >>>> rules?
>
> --
> char
> *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
> main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8?
> c<<=1:
> (c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0;
> }}}
>
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/new-rules---where-do-i-activate-them--tp31008400p31059962.html
Sent from the SpamAssassin - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
