Hi, > http://ruleqa.spamassassin.org/20110409-r1090548-n/T_RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_BL/detail > HOSTKARMA_BL overlaps with MSPIKE_BL 88% of the time, but detects far fewer > spam and and with slightly more FP's. Compared to last year, HOSTKARMA_BL's > safety rating has improved considerably on a sustained basis, and if we were > evaluating it alone it wouldn't be too bad. But now that we see the > overlaps, HOSTKARMA_BL at this very moment is pretty close to a redundant > and slightly less safe subset of RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL. Given these > measurements, it probably isn't helpful to use HOSTKARMA_BL.
What is the recommended score for the MSPIKE rule(s)? I currently have it set to 2.1. Should/can it be set higher? Thanks for this update. Alex
