On 07/28/2011 09:28 AM the voices made RW write:
There seems to be a consensus that SPF and DKIM passes aren't worth
significant scores. So how is it that RP_MATCHES_RCVD, scores -1.2 when
it just a circumstantial version of what SPF does explicitly.
For me it's hitting more spam that ham, and what's worse, it's mostly
hitting low-scoring freemail spam. Is it just me that's seeing this, or
is there maybe some kind of bias the test corpora?
+1
RP_MATCHES_RCVD hits tons of (snowshoe?) spam here. Different senders
different IPs, but often the same /16 or /24 networks. I had some local
meta rules that used T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD, but evidently the name was
changed to RP_MATCHES_RCVD and the spam started flying in.
