Can this really be true?
On 7/29/11 5:28 AM, Axb wrote:
On 2011-07-29 11:14, monolit939 wrote:
Hello,
I have found test which says the change of type of Spamassassin
database can
its not just faster than DB, but faster the innodb/mysql.pm?
one of the things I like about innodb/mysql.pm is that ever since moving
to it, I have had NOT bayes corruptions on any of our systems, including
some large ones.
if you use mysql.pm for other things (sql params, user's, etc), it still
doesn't seem to make sense to use sdbm AND mysql.
I have found just this
http://wiki.mailscanner.info/doku.php?id=documentation:anti_spam:spamassassin:bayes:sdbm&rev=1269508492
guide , but it describes solution for mailscanner...
but, this is interesting.
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.secnap.com/products/spammertrap/
______________________________________________________________________
