On 9/1/2011 10:23 AM, J4K wrote: > Hi there, > > I've got these two rules in the local.cf. > > describe PRIVATE_RULE1 English language job opportunity > body __PR1 /(Employment opportunity|Job offer match, respond > to apply|Employment you've been searching|Job opportunity|Career > opportunity inside|Position opening in your area|Work offer > inside|Vacancy - apply online|Job ad - see details! Sent through Search > engine|Get a New Job Today|Working Part Time|Virtual Manager Vacancy)/i > uri __PR2 /(aaaa\.(com|net)|bbbb\.(com|net)|cccc\.com)/i > meta PRIVATE_RULE1 (__PR1 && __PR2) > score PRIVATE_RULE1 2.5 > > describe PRIVATE_PHONICA2 Opt-out mailing list will not honour > un-subscriptions. > body __PP1 /(New Release Update)/i > uri __PP2 /(pppp\.com|gggg\.com)/i > meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PR1 && __PR2) > score PRIVATE_PHONICA2 0.1 > > Spamassassin -D -lint records this: > Sep 1 15:45:56.313 [11484] dbg: rules: PRIVATE_PHONICA2 merged > duplicates: PRIVATE_RULE1 > > What is this really telling me, and why is there a connection between > the two rules? > I think that these don't anyway, because I have not yet seen these in a > test message containing the domains nor bodies.
Because they are duplicates: meta PRIVATE_RULE1 (__PR1 && __PR2) meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PR1 && __PR2) It looks like the second one is supposed to be: meta PRIVATE_PHONICA2 (__PP1 && __PP2) -- Bowie
