> Rather than tampering with the original mail, surely the solution is to > clearly detect the mail as spam in the first place so it hopefully never > reaches the user.
the point is that I dont think it would be a good idea to let SA give a high score based on an "apparently" missmatch between text and url. > History has taught me that if there's a link, someone *will* click on it > regardless of how obvious it might be to you or I that the link is > malicious. I think the same as you! thats why I said "another" step before the click......but that step may be usefull
