On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 10:06:44 +1000 Noel Butler wrote:
> its up to them if they want to or not, the spam folders have very > little in them here because of our approach, and in our tests we have > had 0.00000001% of FP's in that, which is really good. At 1.7 million email a day that's at very most 1 FP in 16 years, which would suggest you have had less than 1 FP since SA was released. > I guess those that actually do check spam folders only look at the > displayed name in the run down list (without going into any of the > spams), we also replace the subject with just "[spam] attached" I think it would be very difficult to spot an FP that way. The FPs I've seen are mostly generated by web-servers, and they are mostly "first-contact". And even if the displayed name is recognisable it's usually the subject that makes the FP stand-out.
