On Wed, 30 Nov 2011 08:25:43 -0800, John Hardin wrote:

> On Wed, 30 Nov 2011, Walter Hurry wrote:

>> Why replicate? Why not just share the same database?
> 
> Latency and reliability of the link between the "geographically separate
> locations". Replication is typically robust in the face of unreliable
> networking and high latency and will recover from outages, and most
> people don't want their mail delivery system doing WAN database queries
> with the associated (assumed) high latency, limited bandwidth and risk
> of service interruption that is inherent in a WAN.

Good points. Actually I missed the "geographically separate locations" 
bit - mea culpa.


Reply via email to