Prob better to ask on the mailscanner list as this is a fairly common query
Martin
On Wednesday, 6 June 2012, David B Funk wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Jun 2012, Christian Reynolds wrote:
>
> Hello,
>>
>> I am running a CentOS 5 / SpamAssassin 3.3.1-2 / MailScanner 4.84.5-2 /
>> Postfix 2.3.3-2.3
>>
>> I have been running MailScanner + Postfix + SA for several years, and
>> recent network changes have caused me a bit of a problem. Some of my road
>> warriors are running into trouble away from the office because their
>> addresses are seen as a PBL by spamhaus, and my mailserver is starting to
>> trap their outbound emails as spam. I have all of the mail clients going
>> to a special postfix port, and it usually works.
>>
>> I am wondering if my SASL-equipped mail clients can bypass spamassassin's
>> checks, and be routed through?
>>
>> I am running Postfix on a different port, let's call it 50000.
>>
>> Is anyone aware of a ruleset, or a postfix setting, or something that
>> would allow me to have these SASL authenticated messages pass spamassassin,
>> and thus not be marked, and be sent on their merry way?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Christian
>>
>
> Yes,
> It depends upon exactly how you have SA hooked into your postfix.
> It's been discussed several times on this list.
>
> Search the archives of this list for bypassing or having SA properly
> recognise authenticated users' mail. (smtp-auth).
>
>
> --
> Dave Funk University of Iowa
> <dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
> 319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
> Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_**admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
> #include <std_disclaimer.h>
> Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
>
--
--
Martin Hepworth, CISSP
Oxford, UK
