15.08.2012 20:36, Ben Johnson kirjoitti: > Hello, > > Some 99% of the spam that I receive, which is grossly spammy (we're > talking auto loans, cash advances, dink pills, the whole lot) contains > "BAYES_00=-1.9" in the tests portion of the X-Spam-Status header. > > Might anyone know why? This is a stock installation (Ubuntu package on > 10.04). > > local.cf contains > > # Bayesian classifier auto-learning (default: 1) > # > # bayes_auto_learn 1 > > and I have not overridden the default elsewhere. So, presumably, > auto-learning is enabled (if that's event relevant). > > While I have not trained the Bayesian filter manually to date, how is it > that the spammiest of the spam is being classified with BAYES_00 > (thereby receiving the score -1.9)? Doesn't BAYES_00 imply that the > message is almost certainly not spam? How could the Bayes classifier know that it is spammy, if no one make it learn what spam looks like?
Start training it now. > > Others have run into this same problem, but I see no resolution; here is > one such example: > > http://forums.eukhost.com/f38/problems-spamassassin-bayes-filter-16948/ > > Outside of the above forum post, search query results for this issue are > scant. > > Thanks for any help, > > -Ben > -- "Never thought the space i "Program Files" would be a problem in Linux" Husse Apr 9 2007
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
