On Sun, 21 Oct 2012, dar...@chaosreigns.com wrote:
I believe that means the score was low enough that it was automatically fed
to sa-learn as ham (non-spam).
Correct.
That's scary, I don't use it (bayes_auto_learn 0).
Agreed, but I run a very small installation. I can see where it would be
useful at a large installation with few users willing to compentently
train misses.
Joe, what exactly do you mean below when you describe the message? The
subject was only a FTP link (which the hits suggest is not the case)? Or
the subject was empty and the body was only a FTP link?
Perhaps SA should only autolearn when the body of the message is some
minimum size, to avoid mislearning on spams like this?
On 10/21, Joseph Acquisto wrote:
Today I found a missed SPAM that contained this in the header:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,MISSING_SUBJECT,
T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
The subject was empty with a link starting with "ftp:"
I guess it's the autolearn that is most puzzling me.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Politicians never accuse you of "greed" for wanting other people's
money, only for wanting to keep your own money. -- Joseph Sobran
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
143 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
