24.10.2012 18:19, Ned Slider kirjoitti: > I have had very good success running adjusted scores for BAYES rules, > but I am very careful how I train my bayes database. I've disabled > auto-learning and only manually train on hand-checked ham and spam > examples. Consequently, I find the extremes (BAYES_99 and BAYES_00) to > be highly reliable indicators. I have never seen false BAYES_99, but false BAYES_00 is not that rare.
-- You learn to write as if to someone else because NEXT YEAR YOU WILL BE "SOMEONE ELSE."
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
