On Mon, 6 May 2013, Neil Schwartzman wrote:
On May 5, 2013, at 7:04 PM, John Hardin <jhar...@impsec.org> wrote:
On Sun, 5 May 2013, Benny Pedersen wrote:
John Hardin skrev den 2013-05-05 22:44:
abuse-alert on any domain is not rfc compliant
Agreed.
Disagreed. So long as abuse@ is working, the domain is compliant with RFCs.
Sorry, I was assuming that abuse-alert@ was being offered *instead of*
rather than in addition to abuse@
If there is a working abuse@ address that *isn't being ignored*, they're
compliant.
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Trusting in anti-gun laws to keep you from being shot is like
refusing to wear your seatbelt because you trust traffic laws to
keep you from being in a car accident. -- Erin Palette
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 days until the 68th anniversary of VE day
