Karsten Bräckelmann skrev den 2013-05-08 01:03:
Reporting abuse of a domain specifically registered with the clear
intention to spam, to the very domain's abuse@ address, is pointless.
It's like letting the spammers know you've read it...
that is correct if pw domains using there own mailserver, and abuse@
does not is aliases to mailserver admin for the server networking, then
it would be telling spamming domain its monitored for spamming, it will
still be good to see if spamming stops after complaining
rfc-ignorant was right, send a "spam" mail to abuse@ and there with a
link to unlist in rfci, if that link was not readed and handled continue
to list at rfci
but this is maybe long time dropped ? :=)
abuse-alert on any domain is not rfc compliant
The whole point of this is providing an address to report abuse to
someone who cares and can stop further abuse.
you asume that abuse@ goes to the spammers ?
FWIW, there is no relevant RFC, and the provided addresses are *not*
at
"any domain".
+1 then it will be blocked
--
senders that put my email into body content will deliver it to my own
trashcan, so if you like to get reply, dont do it
