Matus UHLAR - fantomas skrev den 2013-06-04 15:20:
some do but after milters are checked. That's why e.g. sa-milter
must fake
Received: headers when passing the mail to spamassassin.
On 04.06.13 15:35, Benny Pedersen wrote:
basicly yes, but why not test client ip rbl in mta stage ?
what does this have in common with Received: headers? If the mail is
rejected, there's no point in further filtering.
According to my information the point is that milter can see the mail before
the mail is changed in any way.
- sa-milter
is one milter that is basicly brokken, it just contains a workaround,
spampd does not need any workaround
besically broken in what way? That it fakes Received: header so the mail can
be processed with SA without SA hacks?
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
There's a long-standing bug relating to the x86 architecture that
allows you to install Windows. -- Matthew D. Fuller
