>>> On 8/23/2013 at 6:43 AM, "Joe Acquisto-j4" <j...@j4computers.com> wrote: >>>> On 8/23/2013 at 3:42 AM, James Griffin <j...@kontrol.kode5.net> wrote: >> !-- On Wed 21.Aug'13 at 14:51:56 BST, Matus UHLAR - fantomas >> (uh...@fantomas.sk), wrote: >> >>> On 21.08.13 09:47, Joe Acquisto-j4 wrote: >>> >I find a few of those 3 link (sudden craving for an IHOP breakfast spams, >>> >that contain mass quantities of non printable text in the body. This >>> >causes spamc to skip them. >>> > >>> >Cannot find where to change the message size, tho I must have, as it tells >>> >me the limit is 512000 where I understand the default is 256000. >>> > >>> >If that is so, can someone clue me as to where to adjust this? A quick >>> >scan of the usual sources did not satisfy. >>> >>> man spamc should say it: >>> >>> -s max_size, --max-size=max_size >> >> Are you invoking spamc with procmail, which may specify a file size in >> the procmail recipe? >> >> -- >> >> >> James Griffin: jmz at kontrol.kode5.net >> >> A4B9 E875 A18C 6E11 F46D B788 BEE6 1251 1D31 DC38 > > Postfix. Called via a script I did not recall at the time, where I added a > -s value. I gather the > default is now 512000. > > joe a.
Well, now that I increased the size, they did too. However, now it slips thru without a word as to why. mime below (large section of fill words snipped to meet pastebin limit): http://pastebin.com/7hSxDZmg Should it at least tell me it skipped due to size?
