On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 15:20:41 -0400 David F. Skoll wrote: > On Tue, 17 Sep 2013 20:08:22 +0100 > RW <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > > It is a bit more complicated than I thought though. Rounding > > towards zero produces sensible results for the 5.0 threshold, but it > > becomes more complicated if one needs to handle threholds close to, > > or below, zero and which aren't multiples of 0.1. > > Actually, 0.1 cannot be represented exactly in binary. It is > 0.0001100110011.... in base 2.
Yes, I know, that doesn't actually affect anything though. It's a matter of allowing for the displayed threshold to be rounded as well as the score.
