reject_rbl_client all.spamrats.com <http://all.spamrats.com/>
On 29.05.14 13:17, Alex wrote:
What's that? That doesn't really have a reputation here, and it's not going to be more effective than zen or barracuda. Set up your RBLs so they're weighted. Implement postscreen with postfix.
5 years ago I have posted question about this blacklist: http://marc.info/?l=spamassassin-users&m=123920398923786&w=2
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.147 tagged_above=-999 required=5.3____ tests=[BAYES_99=4.5, BAYES_999=0.2, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,____ MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.723, RDNS_NONE=2.013, T_REMOTE_IMAGE=0.01,____ URIBL_BLACK=1.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST_TO=-6] autolearn=noWhy is this user whitelisted if you consider it to be spam?
it's the recipient that is whitelisted. In such case it is really silly to blame SA for not marking _any_ mail as spam... -- Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address. Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu. Microsoft dick is soft to do no harm
