Headers of test message (no webmail involved in this transmission as far as I can tell):
Return-Path: <[email protected]> Authentication-Results: inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (amavisd-new); domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) [email protected] header.d=international.gc.ca Received: from inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2EVW_2VhtCBf; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:04:46 -0400 (EDT) Received-SPF: Pass (sender SPF authorized) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=198.103.104.106; helo=mail5.international.gc.ca; [email protected]; [email protected] Received: from Mail5.international.gc.ca (mail5.international.gc.ca [198.103.104.106]) by inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 14 May 2014 14:04:44 -0400 (EDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail5; d=international.gc.ca; q=dns; c=simple; h=From:To:CC:Subject:Thread-Topic:Thread-Index:Date:Message-ID:References:In-Reply-To:Accept-Language:Content-Language:X-MS-Has-Attach:X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:x-dm-mail-id:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version:X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG; b=lmAaCU5cd3SdRnGlpBpyNt/pO5t65+QhE2zcJJBRvp9D4rO78i1dp9+wg/oOO6RvJaiZAZoWFZhVJoo0GCQZaucJgSug8H80Prz4z9FCNIFzhISQadNUReGZBrEydgd6Tyi/FxnVSx/bceK93HDdvse7dxgWCyvpXVrctosiYjI=; From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> CC: <[email protected]> Subject: RE: EICS certificate recovery Thread-Topic: EICS certificate recovery Thread-Index: Ac9uHpqtIVvvPHvpQ9Sp07Y8FHGkPAAIbYmAAAhCWwD//8jEgP/9TqzA Date: Wed, 14 May 2014 18:04:42 +0000 Message-ID: <39c0fbcc920fda4bb1208833fba2a40717e10...@lbp-dmexm12.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca> References: <39c0fbcc920fda4bb1208833fba2a40717e0e...@lbp-dmexm12.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca> <[email protected]> <39c0fbcc920fda4bb1208833fba2a40717e0e...@lbp-dmexm12.d.r.dfait-maeci.gc.ca> <[email protected]> In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> Accept-Language: en-CA, en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-dm-mail-id: E87C2A5-A5F3-4435-AE91-A09EC7AF621D Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: 170369b0-b740-4e85-860b-ed9d5c4fb69a Received-SPF: none Results: spamassassin -D -L < local.test X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on inet08.hamilton.harte-lyne.ca X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=5.5 required=4.5 tests=BAYES_00,MISSING_DATE, MISSING_FROM,MISSING_HEADERS,MISSING_MID,MISSING_SUBJECT, TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-DCC: : X-Spam-Level: ***** X-Spam-Pyzor: X-Spam-Report: * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET TVD_RCVD_SPACE_BRACKET * 1.2 MISSING_HEADERS Missing To: header * -1.5 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 1.2 MISSING_MID Missing Message-Id: header * 1.3 MISSING_SUBJECT Missing Subject: header * 1.5 MISSING_FROM Missing From: header * 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines * 1.8 MISSING_DATE Missing Date: header ; I do not know why this is happening. Is there some switch I am supposed to pass spamassasin when I use it on a message text file? -- *** E-Mail is NOT a SECURE channel *** James B. Byrne mailto:[email protected] Harte & Lyne Limited http://www.harte-lyne.ca 9 Brockley Drive vox: +1 905 561 1241 Hamilton, Ontario fax: +1 905 561 0757 Canada L8E 3C3
