On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, David Jones wrote:
If SEM was able to detect newly registered domains more quickly then
that would solve the problem.
Oh, agreed.
The problem is, a registrar feed of registration changes costs a lot, and
this is a free project.
That's why I suggested trying to develop relationships with registrars,
to maybe get them onboard with providing this data for free for this
purpose.
It's possible that the Apache name could provide cachet to get registars
onboard to provide rsync'able data feeds of domain names registered in the
last N days. It might be possible/better to get them to provide the data
to URIBL.org (to act as an aggregator) with a license to provide the data
free via DNS (i.e. non-bulk access) and at a nominal fee for rsync access
(which URIBL already charges for the data they collect).
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
You can't reason a person out of a position if he didn't use
reason to get there in the first place. -- Kristopher, at Marko's
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
739 days since the first successful private support mission to ISS (SpaceX)
