Both of those are recent, I believe and both have reasons to blacklist.
Reporting here is fine. Joe will look at moving them to our marketing list but
in the end you might have to consider a custom score because we consider places
with convicted spammers as suitable for listing even if there is collateral
damage. Especially if they are in the bulk mailing business.
Regards,
KAM
David B Funk <dbf...@engineering.uiowa.edu> wrote:
>We're seeing FPs on legitimate messages caused by KAM_BODY_URIBL_PCCC.
>It is firing on URLs from MSPs that (altho they may have some
>questionable
>clients) have legimate customers. EG: mandrillapp-dot-com and
>streamsend-dot-com
>
>I'm a bit suprised that this rule would have a one-shot-kill score
>of 5.0 (particularly in light of the FP potential).
>
>Who should I report this stuff to?
>
>
>--
>Dave Funk University of Iowa
><dbfunk (at) engineering.uiowa.edu> College of Engineering
>319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center
>Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527
>#include <std_disclaimer.h>
>Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{
