Am 25.08.2014 um 17:43 schrieb John Hardin: > On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 25.08.2014 um 16:06 schrieb John Hardin: >>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>>> i am at setup a new mailgateway and playing around >>>> with spamassassin-3.4.0 and spamass-milter which >>>> looks both well - but after the update tonight my >>>> testmessage goes down from 7.5 to 5.3 >>> >>> 5.0 is still the score for "spam". Rather than focusing on the specific >>> score, has the update caused FNs to increase? >> >> i know that it is "still spam" but before the update the current >> testing setup would reject that message with spamass-milter and >> "-r 7.5" while after the update it would slip through and only >> flagged in the subject which don't work at all (see other thread) > > OK, so they've become user-visible.
yes and that is one which the currently existing Barracuda Spamfirewall scored with around 20 and grabbed from the backend there for testings >> so that change has indeed impact on the amount of rejected spam >> >> i attached the plain content as ZIP which hopefully makes it >> to the list :-) > > Best practice is to post the entire message to something like pastebin, > then send the URL for that to the list OK, did not know because on most other lists it's disapproved the plain content i attached as ZIP (what made it to the listg) is used for testing by just copy the content to a formmailer or in a new plaintext message in TB point directly to the test MX
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature