Am 25.08.2014 um 17:43 schrieb John Hardin:
> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 25.08.2014 um 16:06 schrieb John Hardin:
>>> On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>
>>>> i am at setup a new mailgateway and playing around
>>>> with spamassassin-3.4.0 and spamass-milter which
>>>> looks both well - but after the update tonight my
>>>> testmessage goes down from 7.5 to 5.3
>>>
>>> 5.0 is still the score for "spam". Rather than focusing on the specific
>>> score, has the update caused FNs to increase?
>>
>> i know that it is "still spam" but before the update the current
>> testing setup would reject that message with spamass-milter and
>> "-r 7.5" while after the update it would slip through and only
>> flagged in the subject which don't work at all (see other thread)
> 
> OK, so they've become user-visible.

yes and that is one which the currently existing
Barracuda Spamfirewall scored with around 20 and
grabbed from the backend there for testings

>> so that change has indeed impact on the amount of rejected spam
>>
>> i attached the plain content as ZIP which hopefully makes it
>> to the list :-)
> 
> Best practice is to post the entire message to something like pastebin, 
> then send the URL for that to the list

OK, did not know because on most other lists it's disapproved

the plain content i attached as ZIP (what made it to the listg)
is used for testing by just copy the content to a formmailer or
in a new plaintext message in TB point directly to the test MX

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to