Am 06.01.2015 um 21:31 schrieb Marieke Janssen:
policyd-spf[11818]: None; identity=mailfrom; client-ip=213.145.228.32;
helo=host5.ssl-gesichert.at;
envelope-from=kundeninfo-return-1-***@domaintechnik.at; receiver=***
$ dig txt +short host5.ssl-gesichert.at
"v=spf1 mx a ~all"
Seems it works as it should?
On 06.01.15 21:41, Reindl Harald wrote:
did you follow the thread?
it's particularly hard to follow this thread, since the same things get
repeated multiple times.
i explained multiple times what annoys me and that SPF_HELO_PASS in
context of a content-scanner is questionable for non-SPF envelopes
* it is pointless
* it revokes the intended little penalty for SPF_NONE
* it is a skipable test
* less pointless tests = better performance
it has been already said anything to that topic including disable the
test local
what if there would be SPF_HELO_FAIL ?
Maybe you could disable checking SPF_HELO, but some of us don't want that.
You can _NOT_ know if SPF HELO fails before you do the test.
...and if it's the policyd who checks for SPF on your system, it's too late to
blame SA.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
The only substitute for good manners is fast reflexes.
