Am 09.09.2015 um 10:56 schrieb Farkas Zsolt:
One of our SA installation has gone mad since a few days:
Content analysis details: (12.5 points, 15.0 required)
Content analysis details: (10.7 points, 15.0 required)
2015.09.09. 11:02 keltezéssel, Reindl Harald írta:
15.0 required - seriously?
On 09.09.15 11:20, Farkas Zsolt wrote:
it was 4.9 but after the stange behavior it was raised for 15.
if I set back to 4.9 it will give lot of false positive
could you show us which rules hit at some false positives?
playing with required_score is usually not very good idea...
-it has been filtering bad words but with manual regex check there is no
match
you don't provide any informations
it gave 10 point for badword rule but there was no match
... just the same as scoring 10 points for single rules.
They might match where you don't see it.
using properly trained BAYES and network rules should make SA behave much
better than banned words rules.
Debian 6.0.10
Samassassin 3.3.2-5+deb7u2
perl 5.10.1-17squeeze6
very outdated
this is included in debian 6 LTS
it should still be better to upgrade to more current versions.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uh...@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
"The box said 'Requires Windows 95 or better', so I bought a Macintosh".
