It could be challenging if someone impersonated a bank and they did it
right. I'm looking at more aspects than just the content of the message
but that's an area where there is some possible weakness. There are
other tricks to address the specifically. And I am looking at behavior
and headers as well.
To be a little clearer. This new system isn't perfect. And it's main
strength is identifying good email. It does catch a lot more spam for
sure but when people scream at me it's because I blocked something
important. So think of this more as detecting ham as it's big feature.
On 01/20/16 14:37, jdow wrote:
And just how well does this work against spearfishing? And would the
same magic list work for ma and pa Kettle well into their 80s only
receiving emails from their children and Freddie Burfle with his heads
buried in a corporate accounts payable office?
{^_^}
