On 2/26/2016 12:46 PM, Antony Stone wrote:
On Friday 26 February 2016 at 18:14:53, Axb wrote:
On 02/26/2016 06:04 PM, John Hardin wrote:
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
score VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG 3.999 3.999 3.999 3.999
header __VERY_LONG_REPTO Reply-To =~ /[^\s\@]{20,}\@/
Reply-To: [email protected]
very long?
20 chars?
4 points?
seriously?
that needs to be lower scored or 20 raised to much higher values
OK, set to 25 and limit 3.5
This rule is definitely bad.
A lot of euro languages have domains with a ton of chars.
imo, a lame excuse of a rule.
my LOUD -1 for this kind of exercise.
And another from me (40 chars in my address, for example).
[email protected]
Take another look at that regex. It's not matching domains. The match
has to be followed by an @, so it is matching the user part of the address.
FWIW, the VERY_LONG_REPTO_SHORT_MSG rule has not hit anything at all on
my server in the last month.
--
Bowie
