Re: FSL_HELO_HOME: deep headers again

[Reindl Harald]

Am 14.05.2016 um 04:04 schrieb John Hardin:

On Fri, 13 May 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:

i can't rsync customer mails to a 3rd party

You don't have to. You run the masscheck locally and only upload the
rule hit results. I upload my corpora because they are just my email and
are thus tiny.

If you select your corpora filenames properly, no information should leak.

OK

if that would be based on some webervice where you just feed local
samples and only give the rules which hitted and spam/ham flag out it
would be somehow possible

How would a webservice be better? That would still be sending customer
emails to a third party for processing.

uhm you missed "and only give the rules which hitted and spam/ham flag out"

especially you would not have much from the bayes-samples because they
would trigger all sort of wrong rules after strip most headers and and
a generic received header (which seems to be needed by the
bayes-engine for whatever reason since it otherwise scores samples
completly different)

Corpora with headers stripped does present a problem. The masscheck
corpora should be complete as received

and that is not possible - samples are stripped and anonymized

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature