Am 19.05.2016 um 17:44 schrieb Joseph Brennan:
Reindl Harald <h.rei...@thelounge.net> wrote:"doing those best" must be the reason for a testing-SPF instead "-all" come on......Remember that the DMARC people changed Internet Message Format so that "From:" no longer shows the person who wrote the message but must "align" with the mail system that sent the message?
remember all the problems it brings like for mailing-lists as this one?
Well, they also changed the SPF protocol so that -all should not be used. Using ~all causes processing to continue through DKIM and DMARC, and then the failure gets reported to the "ruf" address. Using -all is just for SPF-only people
ah so i need to implement on my side DMARC to give them the benefit of DMARC reports while i could with a proper setup JUST REJECT a froged message long before SpamAssassin - what a improvement
anyways, your whole DMARC stuff has *nothing* to do with what you responded original because it don't and can't change ANYTHING about spam from gmail accounts, they pass SPF/DKIM/DMARC
so what do you try to explain me?scoll up in the thread where you startet to respond about DMARC and then try to get the context of the thread - hint: it has NOTHING to do with forged mail from whatever servers
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
