Antony Stone wrote: > On Thursday 02 June 2016 at 15:12:58, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> it's highly unlike in a proper setup that SA faces enough email to hit >> the URIBL limit > > Once again, as you said yourself, "highly unlikely". That does not mean > "impossible". Indeed. We received notice from Spamhaus, uribl.com, and surbl.com as our customer base grew enough for us to start making enough queries to cross the "free usage" threshold. We have our own cache servers; we do not use someone else's upstream cache. -kgd
