Am 04.06.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Robert Chalmers:
I’m trying to discover why T_SPF_TEMPERROR and the other below it are not scoring higher even though they are actually failing?
because that's the purpose of a testing rule and because it does you a favour *not* to score any sort of TEMPERROR
the better question is why do you score rules you don't understand higher? RTFM: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4408#section-2.5.6
This is the part from a spam message that is sneaking through.X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on zeus.localhost X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,RDNS_DYNAMIC,T_DKIM_INVALID,T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR,T_SPF_TEMPERROR autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * 0.0 T_SPF_TEMPERROR SPF: test of record failed (temperror) * 0.0 T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR SPF: test of HELO record failed (temperror)In local.cf I havelocal.cf:score SPF_FAIL 2 local.cf:score SPF_HELO_FAIL 2 local.cf:score SPF_SOFTFAIL 2 local.cf:score T_SPF_HELO_TEMPERROR 2 local.cf:score T_SPF_TEMPERROR 2
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
