Re: why does that mail not get any bayes-classification

[Reindl Harald]

Am 11.06.2016 um 15:55 schrieb Sidney Markowitz:

Reindl Harald wrote on 12/06/16 1:04 AM:

output of "spamassassin -D  < ignored_by_bayes_stripped.eml" attached

See this line in that output:

  Jun 11 14:47:00.510 [5188] dbg: bayes: cannot use bayes on this message; not
enough usable tokens found

i would expect a bayes result in any case and even if it's just a
informational BAYES_NOTOKS

Not by default, but see the tags in the next lines in your debug output,
starting with

Jun 11 14:47:00.510 [5188] dbg: check: tagrun - tag BAYESTCHAMMY is now ready,
value: 0
Jun 11 14:47:00.510 [5188] dbg: check: tagrun - tag BAYESTCSPAMMY is now
ready, value: 0

And see how you can add custom headers to your output that includes these tags
as documented here:

https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Conf.html#template_tags

sadly that works only for mail-headers - but don't appear in the logs nor in a report generated with "/usr/bin/spamc -R" over a webinterface which proceeds uploads of eml-files :-( a test-tag BAYES_NOTOKS or however called would appear on all places while for the spamd-log _SENDERDOMAIN_ and _AUTHORDOMAIN_ would give the benefit that you could also find out something useful about a result when there is no message-id

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature