On 06/13/2016 09:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 13.06.2016 um 20:49 schrieb David B Funk:
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Reindl Harald wrote:
* the syntax seems to be correct
* domain listet and dig answers correctly on the sa-machine
* spamassassin -D < sample.eml 2> out.txt
* grep for the uribl don't show any call
uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A
body URIBL_LOCAL eval:check_uridnsbl('URIBL_LOCAL')
describe URIBL_LOCAL Contains an URL listed in the URIBL blacklist
score URIBL_LOCAL 0.1
tflags URIBL_LOCAL net domains_only
____________________________________________
with that two variants errors appear in the maillog while i don't get
what's wrong with tell the return-code here - anyways, that confirms
that the rule above seems not to be wrong
Jun 13 00:19:17 mail-gw spamd[5953]: config: SpamAssassin failed to
parse line, "URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2" is not
valid for "uridnsbl", skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL
uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2
Jun 13 00:20:03 mail-gw spamd[5953]: config: SpamAssassin failed to
parse line, "URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net." is not valid for
"uridnsbl", skipping: uridnsbl URIBL_LOCAL uribl.thelounge.net.
Did you "--lint" check the rules before you tried testing them?
yes, as said the syntax seems to be correct
also according to
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.2.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html
tried also with TXT, no difference, while i would prefer A since it's
shorter in responses and in doubt with a defined response code, but
that's a nice-to-have
That 'SpamAssassin failed to parse line' error sounds like you've got a
syntax error in there
please read again: "failed to parse line" shows different tries as the
rule above (which is listed in the error message) but besides that lint
is fine with the current one it shows that the config seems to be
recognized
why "A 127.0.0.2" is wrong instead jsut "A" is a different issue and
don't matter as long as i would not have different respnse codes for
different rules / scores with a single rbldnsd zone
ignore anything below the line for the real problem
HA! take a look into list and first thing you find is the moaner needing
help coz he so smart he looks at ANCIENT /3.2.x/doc instead of
https://spamassassin.apache.org/full/3.4.x/doc/Mail_SpamAssassin_Plugin_URIDNSBL.html
use
urirhsbl BLAH uribl.thelounge.net. A
or
urirhssub BLAH uribl.thelounge.net. A 127.0.0.2
instead of
uridnsbl
so no "as said the syntax seems to be correct" it is NOT
