On Mon, 22 Aug 2016, Antony Stone wrote:
On Monday 22 August 2016 at 16:45:09, Dianne Skoll wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 07:34:00 -0700 Marc Perkel wrote:
So. What percentage of emails using your algorithm are actually
decidable?
Almost 100% if you look at a wide variety of tokens from multiple
attributes.
I can't believe that, or I'm missing something. Almost every spam I see
contains words that also appear in ham. Things like "this" or "invoice"
or "regards" or "dear".
What am I missing?
I believe you're missing Marc's definition of "token".
...and it looks like we're venturing into the "SA Bayes multiple-word
token support" realm (as a surrogate).
--
John Hardin KA7OHZ http://www.impsec.org/~jhardin/
jhar...@impsec.org FALaholic #11174 pgpk -a jhar...@impsec.org
key: 0xB8732E79 -- 2D8C 34F4 6411 F507 136C AF76 D822 E6E6 B873 2E79
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
USMC Rules of Gunfighting #6: If you can choose what to bring to a
gunfight, bring a long gun and a friend with a long gun.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
2 days until the 1937th anniversary of the destruction of Pompeii
