On 21/02/2017, 18:41, "RW" <rwmailli...@googlemail.com> wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017 17:57:13 +0000
Paul Stead wrote:
> I’ve posted this before, this is how I manage these nasty TLDs:
>
> Make sure WLBLEval is enabled:
>
> loadplugin Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::WLBLEval
>
> Then add the TLDs to a URI_HOST list:
>
> enlist_uri_host (NEWSPAMMY) top
The other way is safer, because it only matches on actual
URLs and not typos, filenames etc.
I can agree with this statement for check_uri_host_listed – possibly worth
noting that check_uri_host_in_blacklist uses the same underlying code – which
is scored +100 by SA internal scoring. Is there a justification for having a
uri list that has been vetted to ensure it is an “actual URL” and not a typo?
I can’t see how this can be the same for the check_from_in_list calls, however?
Paul
--
Paul Stead
Systems Engineer
Zen Internet
