On Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:08:54 +0200 Ralf Hildebrandt wrote: > * David Jones <djo...@ena.com>: > > > Are you hitting the URIBL_BLOCKED rule? If so, please follow the > > link in that reddit article to get rid of that rule hit. This is > > very important. > > Yes, but that's not his problem -- since the URIBL query fails in both > delivery AND his test. > > The actual differences are that these are NOT firing on delivery: > > 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL (OK, his IP might be blocked due to excessive > queries) 1.2 RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET (that should work!)
I'm not really sure what you are saying here, but abuse is the name of that particular SURBL list 1.9 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist URIBL_BLOCKED is in both tests because the IP address of the shared DNS server is blocked. URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL and RCVD_IN_BL_SPAMCOP_NET are most likely missing in the first because the IP and URI domain were listed after delivery. This is very common when you retest after a short delay.
